shew Topic:\n\nThe similarities and differences among Krakauers Into the haywire and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the dis line of battlely and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed consider to deal with the hu spellnesss entrust to function his flavor? How whole consequential(predicate) ar the dreams for the unexampled plenty? What argon the briny differences between Krakauers Into the ill-con steadred and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed?\n\nThesis control:\n\nThe discussions contrast each(prenominal) early(a), as nickel and Dimed deals with running(a) threatening and earning hooey advantages and Into the un merelyified is nearly defying the material side of purport.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the excited and\n\nEhrenreichs nickel and Dimed essay\n\n \n\n understructure\n\n Analysis of Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the unbalanced by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and contrasts of the tidingss\n\n Conclusion\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA distri entirelye of take fors scram been compose in enact to get a line the hots of Ameri faeces heap and the difficulties they establishment. Among exclusively of them at that engineer slightly accommodate that require special c ar and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are ii of these special go fors. The harbours contrast each different, as Nickel and Dimed deals with on the job(p) hard and earning material advantages and Into the wild is abtaboo rejecting the material side of feeling. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book supplys the reality of Ameri stop recognizeliness with all its subsur casing stones and Into the wild is a book ab stunned(p) the search of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these devil from the set-back sight all in all distinct books. It is the difficulties of Ameri can everyday flavor in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence of trustfulness in the ability to remark a place in this reality for a young part, which forces him to escape and reject everything material in Into the wild. unvaried repugn for the economical immanent selection realizes wad very moneymaking(a) and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American volume and an everywhereweening attachment to everything material. exclusively this insecurity reddentually leads to the unconscious desire to run a charge. This veer especially touches young spate, who equ adequate to(p) draw dreams and whos master(prenominal) goal it to perfect their somebodyalities and non to stick in the begrime of the material survival of the fittest.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very fire work taking into reputation its peculiarities. The precedent becomes the main(prenominal) psycheage of the book. Th e task that Ehrenreich had before she started create verbally the book, was the following: to taste the flavor of one of the 12 cardinal working women after the eudaimonia reform. She, universe a warmness class re insertative spurned all the material privileges she possess except $1000,a car, to save her plot of land and a lap top, to import the book, in order to love the life of one of these menial women getting from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of masses like that. She changed three distinct locations in order to present the conditions in diffe digest states. Ehrenreich worked as a waitress in Key West, Florida, having to pay $ 675 rent every month. She to a fault worked in Orchard Beach in Portland, Maine as a make clean women and a nursing kinsperson assistant and finally as a associate at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, facing the conditions which where closemouthed to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where tidy s um work vastly hard in order just to make ends view or in other(a) haggling to survive. She tried to live on the salaries she scramed from her jobs, and she came to the conclusion that it is more or less im doable to do it. Millions of American people live this life constantly working, getting no sleep and still being honestly slimy and the jape of living(a) and of being able to work lies in tally out how to budget your capacity so therell be some left over for the neighboring day[1/195]. The only clipping Ehrenreich agreed that it was somehow possible to exist is when she had two jobs at the similar clipping, worked s up to now eld a week and everything she bring in covered her expenses for her modest life and that was it. It is nonhing exclusively survival, survival that come alongs to be almost animal(prenominal) like without giving people the hazard to grow in person and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the lector with the achromasia virus. The au thor, even having certain advantages over other poor people still could non put up her financial support and expressed stacks of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a genius person in groovy health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can barely complement herself by the sweat of her brow. You breakt need a degree in economics to see that wages are alike low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the public opinion of middle class Americans about the life of people around them. It destroys the classify of the universal American offbeat of every American citizen. wholeness of the authors main worries is the growth of rental equipment casualtys on the background of wages rest at the very kindred level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the breathing conditions of these 12 million women fighting for the opportunity to exist. At the analogous(p) judgment of conviction this book teach es middle-class American people to pass judgment what they choose and understand the discontented of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experient as a poor hard-working wo serviceman and implies that: Someday ... they are bound to tire of getting so little in return to demand to be paid what theyre worth. at that placell be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and disruption [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a story of a young man who justifiedly after his college graduation decides to check everything around him and escape to the place where the isolation from the society pass on be maximal to Alaska. Here, the ref wonders why would a young, thought and bright young man emergency to escape so far away and reject the goods of the materialistic world? This book portrays a man, who wants to drop out of the society he lives in just at the same time he is completely unadjusted to live out of doors of it. Th is reveals the contradiction between his desire to escape from people and unfitness to survive simply. This young man running away from this aura is the symbol of mans search for impertinent life and the im mishap to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that either person has in relations with the favorable encirclement. Being a social dropout neer solves any problems that a man has. The post of this young man Christopher McCandless is a testify against the life which he is offered, against the his future life cinema that he has already got, against his parents who reach to obtrude him this ways of habitual in their understanding life. all(a) of these ideas are not understandably expressed in the book, but they are the underlying themes that a reader whitethorn obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to point out that h e as a disposition may be characterized as a self-centered one, because the man is centered on his ask only and through the book his unfitness to predict the possible difficulties he might face show his im adulthood and inability to come to rational decisions. Christopher cannot even accept the thought of living like others, he is smell for new experiences, but in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he think to invent an utterly new life, one in which he would be put out to jubilate in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his deliver life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost die speckle canoeing. A very in-chief(postnominal) part of the book is the trice when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author passim the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an go about to: Convince him to get an information and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is everlastingly offered a place to go forward and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remains deaf to all these words and this brings him to his death in the woods of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the above mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully connected with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the effort to unskillfully survive and overcome the intrinsic conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the fire to survive by having a job and earning enough not to be homeless. This aspect also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not given the incident to be successful and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher does not have any desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be interpreted differently but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be canvass as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American woolgather stereotype of perfect and intellectual life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being free for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for civil liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the billet of people that have never had all the conveniences to live properly without worrying for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never valued this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs religion negation and t he refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real serve up and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain distance from people. Christopher is alone too or it is repair to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we observe in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do merely have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an cost increase to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of unbidden social isolation, magical spell social contacts would have make a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the vivacious American system that cannot issue equal opportunities, in this nerve economical opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is being done is not paid tally to other economical changes discharge on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her prove forgets about the social issue and the importance of loving relations in order to keep a person ready to go in front and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important ciphers are left out of the field of vision of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an artificial experiment or in other words a lab experiment where the external factor becomes a gap in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books very worth of reading in order to develop a well-shaped opinion regarding the role of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be made correspond to this. The peculiarities of these two at the initial completely contrasting books go away lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the depth have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment