Sunday, February 24, 2019
Acre Woods Retirement Community
Acre wood retirement community case dissect Kimberly woods HSM/230 Axia College at the University of Phoenix Acre wood retirement community case study he resident physical therapist Sara Armstrong manages the retirement communities activity programs, deep a pool was added to its rehabilitation center by they were some accredited design requests that were not met it has been brought to Sarahs upkeep that the safety tread tag on the stairs and the improved wheelchair access to the pool ara which were deal for in planning cost have not been added, when she immediately brings it to the theatre coach of the acre woods beat Adams he basically dismisses it by stating that the residents should simply be happy to have the pool, as well as bringing it to her attention that she has been hired to provide physical therapy only and not to worry nearly the budget. Question one what are some of the potential legal and good issues present in this case study? break up Mark Adams should be held responsible for the negligence which has caused minor accidents to some of the residents he should also listen to and acknowledge the need to regulate the safety of equipment installed deep down acre woods, Sarah has a right to be concerned as part of her muse is therapy for the patients physical well-being. The legal issues here could present three-fold cases of unethical behavior by Mr. Adams part the ethical issues would be his lack of concern of the well-being of the residents of acre woods which in turn could create ternary lawsuits. Question two how would you characterize the directors behavior? come to by the way the paper reads Mark Adams attitude and behavior are unethical and uncalled for as he is the administrator for the induction he should fight back an attitude suitable to that station, his behavior is unjust and critical towards Ms. Armstrong and seemingly unreflective where the residents of the facility are concerned.Question three Is the director and e thical role seat? Why or why not? cause three Mark Adams does not show the ethical behavior that would be expected of a role model in the position of director of any facility he seems to be uncaring as well as blase about the well-being of the residents or the concerns of Sara Armstrong. Question four Were the directors messages congruent with the shapings stated mission? Explain your answer. Answer four No Mark Adams is not being congruent with the stated mission of the organization he does not show concern for the organization nor for its ideals however instead he shows arrogance instead of compassion.Question five what seismic disturbance did the directors actions and attitudes have on the acre woods culture the directors actions did not show concerns or the culture of the facility yet more towards self-preservation when Sara Armstrong product visitation that if you patients had concerns and were showing fear pertaining to the issues of the pool wife Mr. Adam shouldve don e was to investigate the concerns of the residents as well as learn why the safety equipment was not installed, instead his decision to take the record of Gene Levy who was also a physical therapist at acre woods over that of Sara Armstrong did give Sara cause to bring it into the forefront because of her suspicions of the wanting(p) funds where the from the pool project she did the right thing by relating the grunge or her is her opinion of it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment