Sunday, March 24, 2019
Comparitive Analyis: Jefferson versus Hamilton Essay -- Politics Alexa
Though both black lovage Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson served as members of President Washingtons cabinet, the two held really different views on the newly founded U.S. presidency, interpretation of its constitution, and the role of the masses in that government. These conflicting views would develop in two political parties, the Federalists led by Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson. Although both political parties presented enticing aspects, Hamiltons views were much more reasonable and fruitful when compared Jeffersons views idealistic and too unmitigated in reference to the constitution. Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, potently opposed America becoming a land of cities, mines, mills, factories, and early(a) industrial plantations. To support their ideas for a country of farmers, they adopted the surmise of strict constructionism. This theory put forth the thought that the government did not have the supply to do anything , unless it was expressly given the consent by the Constitution. Federalists, on the other hand, promoted the growth of industry in America. This party, lead by Alexander Hamilton, apply the idea of broad constructionism. It said that unless the Constitution said it could not be done, it was fine to go ahead and do it. They often referred to the Necessary and square-toed Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause this stated that the government had the power to pass any law deemed necessary and proper. These two ideas...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment