Effects of the Researcher on Analysis Results

Effects of the Researcher on Analysis ResultsMERA HEERALAL-MAHABIRDESCRIPTION OF date Respond on the following quote Analysis reveals the soul qualification the psychoanalysis non really the install itself., David Lodge 1935 Novelist and Playwright accord to Lester (2010), Analysis is a way of the mind that not only engages with the immaterial world, but in any case internalizes its lesson and learns from them (pg. 115). It is the separation of an intellectual or material unhurt into its constituent p cunnings for individual correction. It is the dissection and c beful study of a piece something to learn about its parts, what they do and how they are connected to each other. This study is a detailed examination of the elements or structure of some considerate of text or act whether it is a poem, film, advertisement or book. ain perspectives are important because they reveal much about the somebody qualification the comment (Lester 2010 p. 122). Some population whitetho rn say that such views throw off limited use solely because they are so some whizal and subjective, and that these interpretations pilenot be comprehensive beyond the individual. This, therefore, does not disclose much with regard to how others cogency hold back importee of an image, advertisement, play or other text or acts. A noteworthy event, image or painting, that is considered a march of art mot times generate personal reaction, indicative about the goal from which it came from. I agree with the notion that an analysis is a radiateion of the person making the analysis and not of the piece itself because of ones ethnical background, personal experiences, and educational shape, all of which inform an individuals perspective of a text.Fiske, (1982) states that when the ethnic groups we belong to comprise a large volume in our community or nation, we are less in all probability to be a fighte of the content of the messages they send us. Cultures shared by preponderan t groups often seem to be natural, normal, the way things are done. We only notice the ready of burnishs that are different from our own, attending to behaviours that we label exotic or strange, misunderstandings in semiotics are considered to be the result of cultural differences and not at communication failure (pg. 2). The de jurisprudencer brings aspects of his or her cultural experience to don upon the codes and signs which make up the text. Therefore, when members of a pre paramount culture decode or make content of something, it is more than possible that that interpretation would be mistakable in nature among those members. Thus text rooted in dominant ideologies can be interpreted through such ideological frames and turn up natural. In this case the analysis reflects the ideology of the text, which in this example is the dominant ideology. Such an example can be seen in the sometimes cultural rationale we ascribe to the wearing particular clothing (leather jackets or pass boots) or to food choices (KFC), as everyday rationale ascribes meaning and moment to that choice. The aforesaid(prenominal) meaning and significance is used by the encoders to spread that dominant ideology through the powerful media. Some may argue that this bridal of false consciousness is the result of a lack of analysis to a particular event, text or experience but it can be considered the result of little or no analysis it can be the result of analysis through ideological lens.Logically, if a culture shares the same codes and conventions, members go out interpret and ascribe meaning that are similar. However, even plurality belonging the same culture may not always pick up the same interpretation because of personal experiences. Theorist, Stuart Hall (1980), states that meaning is not simply fixed or determined by the sender. He argues that the message is neer transparent and the interview is not a passive receiver of meaning as one would like to believe. For ex ample, a news item that features refugees from war torn Egypt that aims to provide a compassionate account of their plight does not promise that people ordain decode it to feel sympathetic towards the refugees. pile from another war-torn country who share the same culture and holiness will be sympathetic and feel strongly that other countries should service of process based on a humanitarian basis. On the other hand, people of another culture, say American culture (individualistic culture), may think the opposite. other example, is Carnival in Trinidad and Tobago. tribe who subscribe to the carnival culture may accept a men gyrating (wining) on a semi-nude women in the streets of the city during the celebration. A viewer from another culture, however, say from an Islamic-Middle-Eastern country may receive this act to be outrageous and shameful. Even persons who share the same Trinidadian culture may not approve of this liberal of behaviour. Negative, personal experiences ma y also cause persons to have an undesirable attitude towards the festival of carnival. People are not entirely free agents and immune to the effects of the culture they inhabit. Thus, when people generate ,meaning from say, for example, a movie , they are inevitably touch by the culture they make love in in ways of which they are unaware. The culture, in other words, speaks through them. Hall (1980) states that messages are decoded and interpreted in different ways depending on the individuals cultural background.An analysis is a reflection of the person making the analysis because of his personal experiences as reflected in the type of readings he makes of the subject macrocosm crumpled For example, because Caribbean people had a negative historical experience of racial parti pris practiced by a white colonial people, they would certainly have a kind of bias towards that race in general. Drawing on a personal example, as a teenager working at a favourite bank in Port of Spain , where at that time only persons of naughty colour were employed, a brown-complexioned East Indian person like myself, had umpteen experiences of racism displayed toward me. This would certainly carry a certain amount of bias in my analysis of any piece done by a white person. So instead of taking the dominant reading for something, I might go for the negotiated or oppositional reading. According to Hall (1980), a person might decide to aspire a dominant-hegemonic position, where he accepts the encoded meaning. He takes the connotated meaning from, say, a television newscast and decodes the message in terms of the referenced code in which it has been encoded. If one subscribes to an oppositional reading, he totally ignores the encoded message even though he understands it. He decodes it in a contrary way. He may also go along with the negotiated reading where he compromises between the hegemonic and oppositional views. Because an audience simply does not passively accept a text, they do not always take the dominant reading. Depending on the reading a person adopts, the analysis would be quite different in all tercet cases.An analysis done by someone holding an elite status, is likely to be different from that of a middle class or low-income group. some(prenominal) factors may contribute to this difference. For example, if someone from this upper elite class were to analyse a painting by Cazabon, he would most likely be educated, widely-read and would have more knowledge and preference of the fine arts. He would most likely know the name of the artist, his other works, and the elegant style macrocosm used. The elite analyst would also probably make references to other artistic traditions and make comparisons with other artists using that style. He would perhaps compare the work being analysed with other works done locally, regionally and internationally. The analysis by the elite will be informed by his experience of being more exposed through educatio n, communication and travel. Foreign travel will assist the elite to acquire first-hand knowledge and would be more likely to identify the genre, medium, metaphors and symbolism of the work. The low-income analyst may not have an appreciation for fine arts because he is caught up more with the daily struggles of live in order to survive such as acquiring the raw material needs of food, shelter and clothing. Because of the upper class upbringing and training (education), and because one might be more widely read, one can pop off a more in-depth analysis of an artistic piece. The elite analyst is also likely to be more articulate.Personal perspectives are significant because they reflect much about an individual making an analysis. Whilst consideration of other views would make the analysis more comprehensive and well-rounded, it still rests with the individual analyst take on the piece being analysed. Factors that contribute to the type of analysis that will emerge depend on the cu ltural background, personal experiences and educational status of the individual making the analysis. This decision however, most times is supported by the ideological influence of dominant power structures in society. Thus it can therefore, be said that analysis is a reflection of the person making the analysis and not the text or act itself.BIBLIOGRAPHYFiske, J. (1990) Introduction to colloquy Studies, Routledge London. p. 2. PrintHall, S. (1980) Encoding /decoding. Culture, Media, Language. Ed. Stuart Hall et al.New York Routledge. Print.Lester, P.M. (2011) Visual Communication Images with messages, Wadsworth Boston.p.122.Print. semiology for Beginners Encoding/Decodingusers.aber.ac.uk/dgc/Documents/S4B/sem08c.html. Web. 19 Mar. 2013. Web.